Karnataka BJP President, BY Vijayendra, has expressed his support for Seer Chandrashekar Swamiji, who is facing an FIR over allegedly making hate-filled statements during a protest against the Waqf issue. Vijayendra remarked that the FIR was unnecessary, as Swamiji had already clarified his position regarding the statements, which were made in frustration over notices issued to farmers, mutts, and temples in the state.
The controversy arose when Swamiji, while participating in a protest against the Waqf issue, made statements that were interpreted as divisive. According to Vijayendra, the statements were made in the heat of the moment, as the Swamiji was upset over the government’s actions and the notices issued to religious institutions and farmers.
“Recently, during a protest against the Waqf issue, Chandrashekar Swamiji had made certain statements, the intent of the statement was, notices were issued to farmers, mutts, and temples, so it is quite natural that Swamiji was also upset and made a strong statement,” Vijayendra explained.
Despite Swamiji’s clarification on the matter, an FIR was registered against him by the state government. Vijayendra criticized this move, calling it unfortunate and unnecessary, especially considering the Swamiji’s attempt to explain his remarks.
“It was not necessary to file an FIR against Swamiji as he had clarified, despite that, the state government registering an FIR is unfortunate,” Vijayendra stated, underscoring his belief that the situation could have been handled differently.
In a show of solidarity, Vijayendra and other BJP leaders met with Swamiji to offer their full support in the wake of the controversy. “We met Swamiji today and assured full support to him,” Vijayendra added, signaling the party’s stance on the matter and its backing for the seer.
The FIR against Swamiji has sparked a political debate in the state, with critics arguing that the government should focus on addressing the concerns raised by religious institutions and farmers, rather than penalizing individuals for their outspoken views. On the other hand, government officials have defended the FIR, claiming that it was necessary to uphold peace and harmony.
As tensions continue to rise, the BJP has rallied behind Swamiji, while the ruling government faces scrutiny over its handling of the situation. With the matter likely to evolve further, both political parties are gearing up for potential consequences as they head into the upcoming election cycle in Karnataka.
This issue highlights the growing concerns over freedom of speech and the role of religious leaders in political protests, as well as the increasing polarization of issues related to religion and governance in Karnataka.
